NetForemostNetForemost
Why usServicesexpand_moreTechnologiesexpand_moreResourcesexpand_more
Contact us
Homechevron_rightResourceschevron_rightPortfoliochevron_rightCore API - Stability, Test Automation & Continous Integration

Core API - Stability, Test Automation & Continous Integration

Enhancing Kafka implementation and test automation on CI pipelines to boost reliability and delivery velocity

QA & releaseEngineering
Core API - Stability, Test Automation & Continous Integrationcollections_bookmarkPortfolio
calendar_todayMay 30, 2026schedule1 min readverifiedQA & release
Duration10 months
Headline Results2 Full-stack Developers, 1 QA Engineer, Augmented by NetForemost DevOps for pipeline best-practices
TeamDedicated Teams
Tools.NET 7, MySQL Tuning, Google Cloud Platform, GitHub Actions, NUnit, SpecFlow, Postman, Newman, Datadog, Snyk and SonarQube

On this page

  • THE CHALLENGE
  • THE SOLUTION
  • 1 • Stability First
  • 2 • Test Automation & Coverage
  • 3 • Observability & KPIs
  • 4 • Continuous Delivery
  • THE OUTCOME
listOn this page7 sectionsexpand_more
  • THE CHALLENGE
  • THE SOLUTION
  • 1 • Stability First
  • 2 • Test Automation & Coverage
  • 3 • Observability & KPIs
  • 4 • Continuous Delivery
  • THE OUTCOME

Enhancing Kafka implementation and test automation on CI pipelines to boost reliability and delivery velocity

linkTHE CHALLENGE

  • Legacy bugs & tech debt – Core endpoints produced intermittent 5xx errors that were hard to reproduce.
  • Low observability – No centralized logging or KPIs to diagnose issues.
  • Glacial releases – Manual regression testing meant a six-week deployment cadence.
  • Knowledge gaps – Sparse documentation made it painful for new hires to contribute.

BetterTrucks needed a reliable, observable, and testable API layer—without halting daily operations.

Core API - Stability, Test Automation & Continous Integration

linkTHE SOLUTION

link1 • Stability First

  • Error budget defined: target ≤ 0.01 % failed requests.
  • Hot-path refactors in C# (.NET 7) eliminated race conditions and N+1 queries.
  • MySQL tuning (indexing, read replicas) cut P95 response times by 38 %.

link2 • Test Automation & Coverage

  • Introduced NUnit + FluentAssertions for unit tests; SpecFlow and Postman for integration scenarios.
  • Built a contract-test harness to validate external partner integrations on every PR.
  • Reached 85 % coverage, catching regressions before they hit production.

link3 • Observability & KPIs

  • Datadog dashboards: latency, error rate, throughput, and deployment health.
  • SLO alerts give ops a 15-minute lead on customer impact.

link4 • Continuous Delivery

  • GitHub Actions workflow runs linting, build, tests, security scan, and blue-green deploy to Google Cloud Platform.
  • Feature flags let product managers toggle functionality without redeploying
Core API - Stability, Test Automation & Continous Integration

linkTHE OUTCOME

  • Five-nines mindset: 99.99 % uptime sustained over the last 90 days.
  • Deployment velocity tripled: shipping every 2 weeks with near-zero rollbacks.
  • Confidence at scale: Automated suite prevents 75 % of previously recurring production bugs.
Core API - Stability, Test Automation & Continous Integration

NetForemost turned our Core API from a black-box liability into a measurable, high-velocity asset. We ship more often, break less, and sleep better.

Mike Koleno, CTO, BetterTrucks

Keep reading

All resourcesarrow_forward
Three circular gauges showing PageSpeed Insights scores of 99 for performance, 95 for accessibility and 92 for SEO after a website redesignauto_storiesCase study

How a B2B website redesign reached a 99 performance score in 2 to 3 weeks

A B2B technology company needed to redesign and relaunch its website in two to three weeks. Here's how NetForemost took the project from design through production while measuring performance, accessibility and SEO.

Delivery visibilityEngineering
calendar_todaySep 28, 2026schedule5 min readarrow_forward
Icon illustration of two teams connected to a central checkmarked stack, representing shared QA process ownership between models.edit_noteArticles

QA as a service vs in-house vs staff augmentation: how to choose

A build-vs-buy framework for choosing between QA as a service, in-house QA, and staff augmentation, plus a readiness score, red flags, and questions to ask before you commit.

QA & release
calendar_todaySep 18, 2026schedule7 min readarrow_forward
Four flush layers bound into one block by a single vertical connector, on a dark backgroundmenu_bookGuide

Full-stack development services: how to evaluate a full-stack team before you sign

Full-stack capability is not the same as integrated delivery. Here is a practical way to tell whether you are hiring one accountable team or a collection of roles, before you sign.

EngineeringDelivery visibility
calendar_todaySep 17, 2026schedule6 min readarrow_forward

Ready to scope your software project?

Schedule discovery hours so we can turn your goals, stack, scope, and risks into a practical delivery plan.

eventContact us
NetForemostNetForemost

AI-native delivery teams for product design, software development, QA testing, and project management.

Services

AI-Native DevelopmentProduct DesignSoftware DevelopmentQA & TestingProject Management

Engagement models

Staff AugmentationSoftware OutsourcingDedicated Team

Why us

More than developersClear delivery visibilityNearshore collaborationFlexible project support

Resources

All resourcesGuidesCase studiesPortfolio

Contact

Book a discovery callLinkedInCareers
© NetForemost 2026·PrivacyTermsSecurity